h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
Blog Article
What's Anyone having good precision with for 180gr products and 4831? Just searching for a starting point so I don't squander a bunch of elements. Thanks for the assistance!
H4831 will operate from the Swift although not actual properly. You can never obtain the pressures you will need for consistency with the .223. 760, or H414 will be much better but for some reason I ain't the biggest fan of most ball powders.
Liberalism; The impossible still approved Idea that it's totally achievable to select up a turd through the clean conclude.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head to while in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm saving the tiny I've still left for fall 2021. I might begin very low and do the job your way up, depending on what load data you check out for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
In any case, I realized The 2 lbs . of H4831SC made use of precisely the same data, but I didn't know irrespective of whether there was anything various in between a pound of powder labeled "Severe" and a single not so labeled. A get in touch with to Hodgdon confirmed they have been in truth similar and the sole big difference was the logo around the label.
I do know, rough situations. H4831SC will certainly do the job, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded prolonged. I do not try to remember powder demand off the highest of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps and that is wherever I commonly intention to get. Within your situation utilizing what you have (and what I ought to have performed) I'd personally get started with the top on the bearing surface area of the bullet ideal for the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as soon as you discover a velocity node.
I have employed both equally and applied the exact same fees and also have not been capable of explain to any noticable discrepancies with general performance. the SC Variation meters a little smoother is about all. any comments??
Like stated previously mentioned, similar things. All that is different is the scale of the kernels. I did hear someplace that they're going to only make the SC in the future. I do not know if that is definitely true or not but would sound right to me. I exploit SC because that is certainly what I located in the eight lb jug and it really works.
I have found the precise opposite to be legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly h4831sc load data exact powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they have got slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are much better. It bug the hell from me. I do know superior. This is why I do not at any time throw out my older manuals. I do buy new manual all the time to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this h4831 vs h4831sc 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ levels with none complications.
So glad your having extra forms of powder back again in. Now you should get primers back in inventory and reloaded can start out reloading all over again.. just declaring
It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Discovered a node and shot some groups. I shot a .six 5 shot group right now. It can be a little slower than H1000, but shoots excellent. Thanks for the recommendation, it's great to realize that I have obtained options h4831sc when 1 or another powder is dried up.
Both equally possess the Exact burn up amount, brief Slice comes in useful if you are at max fill and never at tension/velocity that you would like you can find much more shortcut in a very case.
I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min rates. I’m chatting 2700 (probably 2800) fps, it had been a reduced 60s grain demand in a very Norma situation. Not what I was on the lookout for, but precise Nevertheless.